<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Washington Hotlist &#187; Terrorism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/category/terrorism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com</link>
	<description>Politics 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:26:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Military Spending Reflects Our Flawed Policies</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/military-spending-reflects-our-flawed-policies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/military-spending-reflects-our-flawed-policies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Rosenstock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Axis of Evil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/?p=927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
President Bush on Monday signed legislation to pay for the war operations in Iraq and Afghanistan for the rest of his presidency and beyond&#8230;The legislation will bring to more than $650 billion the amount Congress has provided for the Iraq war since it began more than five years ago. For operations in Afghanistan, the total [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><br />
<blockquote>President Bush on Monday <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25457283/">signed legislation</a> to pay for the war operations in Iraq and Afghanistan for the rest of his presidency and beyond&#8230;The legislation will bring to <strong>more than $650 billion the amount Congress has provided for the Iraq war since it began more than five years ago. For operations in Afghanistan, the total is nearly $200 billion</strong>, according to congressional officials.</p></blockquote>
<p></em></p>
<p>Our taxpayer dollars have been grossly misused and abused in the name of fighting an ambiguous War On Terror.  Can Bush or any of his supporters explain why we have spent so much more on a war against a nation that never attacked us than on one whose former government supported those that did?  </p>
<p>Amount of money spent on fighting the homeland of fifteen of the nineteen 9/11 hijackers (Saudi Arabia) &#8211; $0.  </p>
<p>Amount of money we give the Saudis every day in oil and gas payments &#8211; billions.  </p>
<p>The Bush Administration &#8211; misappropriating your money since 2001.</p>
<p><img src="http://msnbcmedia2.msn.com/j/ap/74c11679-dfb1-45af-8b29-1429c72afbac.hmedium.jpg" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/military-spending-reflects-our-flawed-policies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PUBLIC SEES REPUBLICANS AS BETTER ON NATIONAL SECURITY!</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/public-sees-republicans-as-better-on-national-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/public-sees-republicans-as-better-on-national-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Levine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/?p=917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In every poll taken since 9/11, Americans say they STILL view Republicans as the party better able to deal with terrorism and a national crisis, confirming (as if there were any doubt) that voters either suffer from severe amnesia, or else they are monumentally stupid.</p>
<p>Have they forgotten that it was the Republicans who were in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In every poll taken since 9/11, Americans say they STILL view Republicans as the party better able to deal with terrorism and a national crisis, confirming (as if there were any doubt) that voters either suffer from severe amnesia, or else they are monumentally stupid.</p>
<p>Have they forgotten that it was the <em>Republicans</em> who were in charge when the terrorists struck on 9/11?  That it was the <em>Republicans </em>who decided to invade Iraq, even though Bin Laden and the Taliban were in Afghanistan?  That it was a <em>Republican</em> administration that grossly mismanaged that war?  That itâ€™s <em>Republicans</em> who have failed to protect our ports?  And that it was <em>Republicans </em>who ignored the warnings in the days before Hurricane Katrina, and who then failed to organize an effective rescue effort?</p>
<p>In the face of such a dismal record, how can rational, objective people believe that Republicans, as opposed to Democrats, are better able to handle a national security crisis and are better at protecting America?</p>
<p>Wait.  I see that that question answers itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/public-sees-republicans-as-better-on-national-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stopping The Taliban Should Be Bush&#8217;s Focus</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/stopping-the-taliban-should-be-bushs-focus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/stopping-the-taliban-should-be-bushs-focus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Rosenstock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/stopping-the-taliban-should-be-bushs-focus/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Even now, over six years after 9/11, the President still can not correctly prioritize his foreign policy. After a brief but successful military campaign in Afghanistan, the administration quickly shifted the focus to Iraq and more recently, has attempted to broker a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians.  </p>
<p>But, the real threat continues [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even now, over six years after 9/11, the President still can not correctly prioritize his foreign policy. After a brief but successful military campaign in Afghanistan, the administration quickly shifted the focus to Iraq and more recently, has attempted to broker a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians.  </p>
<p>But, the real threat continues to remain Al Qaeda and its supporters in the Taliban.  After <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080114/ap_on_re_as/afghanistan_4;_ylt=AmF8.8f.HNNA2oVLvbjptGcE1vAI">another attack</a> in Kabul, will the President and his team get the message about where we should be pouring our tax dollars and soldiers?  The recent announcement that approximately 7,500 additional troops will be sent to the region sounds eerily reminiscent of another &#8220;surge,&#8221; an admission that war on the cheap is impossible and requires a shared national sacrifice.  It once meant something to Americans when we sent young men and women across the world to fight for us.  Now, pandering to a political base and increasing profits for campaign contributors are the real American ideals.  </p>
<p>Will our next President implement a more effective strategy to protect us from Al Qaeda?</p>
<p><img src="http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/afp/20080114/capt.sge.sng11.140108142441.photo00.photo.default-512x349.jpg?x=400&#038;y=272&#038;sig=wtV8Ja.oT0SCJtjsK4scgg--" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/stopping-the-taliban-should-be-bushs-focus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And The Truth Finally Comes Out!</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/and-the-truth-finally-comes-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/and-the-truth-finally-comes-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Billy Hallowell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/and-the-truth-finally-comes-out/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you wait long enough, the truth will come out, as is the case concerning a new study that estimates the number of Iraqis who have perished since the war began in 2003.  Surprisingly (especially for liberals who actually believed the preposterous conclusions earlier studies reached), the number of estimated deaths is much lower [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you wait long enough, the truth will come out, as is the case concerning a new study that estimates the number of Iraqis who have perished since the war began in 2003.  Surprisingly (especially for liberals who actually believed the preposterous conclusions earlier studies reached), the number of estimated deaths is much lower than was previously expected.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/09/AR2008010902793.html">A new survey estimates that 151,000 Iraqis died from violence in the three years following the U.S.-led invasion of the country. Roughly 9 out of 10 of those deaths were a consequence of U.S. military operations, insurgent attacks and sectarian warfare.</a></p></blockquote>
<p>But, wait Ã¢â‚¬â€œ werenÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t there 601,000 Iraqi deaths as of November 2006?</p>
<p>If you recall, a study was (conveniently) released just prior to the 2006 Congressional elections that made this monstrosity of a claim.  While there has been an unbelievable amount of carnage in the war-tattered region, the claim seemed then, as it does now, to cite a gross overestimate.</p>
<p>The new estimate Ã¢â‚¬â€œ 151,000 Ã¢â‚¬â€œ seems much more on target, while bearing realism and practicality in mind.  And if you think that my analysis is simply conservative spewing, consider the fact that my opinions on the matter are in line with the consensus that has been reached among research professionals:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/09/AR2008010902793.html">&#8220;Overall, this is a very good study,&#8221; said Paul Spiegel, a medical epidemiologist at the United Nations High Commission on Refugees in Geneva. &#8220;What they have done that other studies have not is try to compensate for the inaccuracies and difficulties of these surveys, triangulating to get information from other sources.&#8221; </a></p></blockquote>
<p>The process of triangulation is essential when conducting research, especially when studying the effects of war.  If one wants to obtain a well-rounded perspective, he or she must consult a number of sources and aggregate data in a matter that makes sense, whilst painting a realistic and accurate portrait of what is occurring.  I am of the opinion that the researchers who concluded with confidence that the 601,000 number was accurate either failed methodologically speaking to properly triangulate, or were blinded by political bias (bear in mind the convenient release of the aforementioned study just prior to the 2006 election).  And no, IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m not going to name or link to the 601,000 study; why give it needless promotion?</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/09/AR2008010902793.html">Spiegel added that &#8220;this does seem more believable to me&#8221; than the earlier survey, which estimated 601,000 deaths from violence over the same period. </a></p></blockquote>
<p>Bearing in mind the quality that human life holds, 151,000 is still a lot of innocence lost.  With this said, it is a more accurate representation of what has been occurring in Iraq.  It is ironic to consider that many ultraliberals will question the American government, yet when a study that seems implausible is released just before a major election, these same skeptical individuals (who could previously be found protesting in New York CityÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Union Square while sporting Ã¢â‚¬Å“9/11 was an inside jobÃ¢â‚¬? t-shirts) do not bat an eyelid; they remain idle.</p>
<p>It is time we wake up to the realities facing our world.  Whether we stay in Iraq or exit prematurely, radical Islamic fascists are not going to stop.  Luckily, we had a president teamed with just enough sensible congressional leaders to ensure that our troops stayed in Iraq and continued working toward a viable conclusion to this previously mismanaged, yet worthy debacle.  Their mission is essential: To protect our nation and the world from the radical tyranny that reached our borders on 9/11.</p>
<p>War means sacrifice.  At some point between World War II and Vietnam, American liberals lost their sense of responsibility Ã¢â‚¬â€œ their ability to see the full picture.  It is my fear that we will fully accept this inability to see the antisystemic forces that are threatening our liberty.</p>
<p>Luckily, some of us are still willing to be skeptical of the skeptics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/and-the-truth-finally-comes-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Al Qaeda Is Stronger Than Ever</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/al-qaeda-is-stronger-than-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/al-qaeda-is-stronger-than-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Rosenstock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benazir Bhutto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/al-qaeda-is-stronger-than-ever/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We have the evidence that al-Qaida and Taliban were behind the suicide attack on Benazir Bhutto,&#8221; Pakistan&#8217;s Interior Minister Hamid Nawaz said. </p>
<p>Six years ago, the United States had a chance to completely dismantle the Al Qaeda terror network and its supporters within the Afghan Taliban government behind a worldwide coalition sympathetic for the 2,754 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<em><strong>We have <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Pakistan-Transcript.html">the evidence</a> that al-Qaida and Taliban were behind the suicide attack on Benazir Bhutto</strong></em>,&#8221; Pakistan&#8217;s Interior Minister Hamid Nawaz said. </p>
<p>Six years ago, the United States had a chance to completely dismantle the Al Qaeda terror network and its supporters within the Afghan Taliban government behind a worldwide coalition sympathetic for the 2,754 Americans that were murdered on 9/11.  Instead, we chose to attack a completely unrelated nation and took our eye off the ball.  Now, we have only thousands of more dead Americans, hundreds of billions of dollars lost and an Iraqi civil war to show for it. </p>
<p>Bhutto&#8217;s death is a direct result of the Bush administration&#8217;s incompetence in foreign policy.  In case you are keeping score at home, the terrorists are winning and if you think we have managed to thwart additional attacks here in the United States because of our federal government&#8217;s policies, you are mistaken.  Waterboarding, warrantless surveillance and the entire Department of Homeland Security have done absolutely nothing to increase our safety.</p>
<p>Al Qaeda has regrouped, they are as powerful as they were before 9/11 and have used our seemingly endless presence in Iraq as their most effective recruiting tool.  For those that seek to kill us, their mission is truly accomplished.  The only thing left for these nuts to do is to send the White House a Thank You card for doing their job for them.  This is not fear mongering, this is reality.</p>
<p><img src="http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20071228/capt.d0a4e2828e9249058d3417fb99b50b96.aptopix_pakistan_bhutto_funeral_lar105.jpg?x=400&#038;y=274&#038;sig=3s7lI57bSQrhoLLBb9y5Dw--" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/al-qaeda-is-stronger-than-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Bush Foreign Policy Failure</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/another-bush-foreign-policy-failure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/another-bush-foreign-policy-failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Rosenstock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benazir Bhutto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/another-bush-foreign-policy-failure/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Certainly, we condemn the attack on this rally. It demonstrates that there are still those in Pakistan who want to subvert reconciliation and efforts to advance democracy,&#8221; said deputy State Department spokesman Tom Casey.</p>
<p>Members of the Bush administration still do not understand that people in foreign lands do not want to be told what to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<em>Certainly, we condemn the attack on this rally. It demonstrates that <strong>there are still those in Pakistan who want to subvert reconciliation and efforts to advance democracy</strong></em>,&#8221; said deputy State Department spokesman Tom Casey.</p>
<p>Members of the Bush administration still <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/27/us.pakistan.ap/index.html">do not understand</a> that people in foreign lands do not want to be told what to do by the United States.  Once again, Bush goes on vacation and terrorists successfully attack.  Apparently, $10 billion in foreign aid doesn&#8217;t buy what it used to.  </p>
<p><img src="http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/2007/POLITICS/12/27/us.pakistan.ap/art.bhutto.afp.gi.jpg" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/another-bush-foreign-policy-failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If The Economy Trumps Terrorism, Dems Will Win in 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/if-the-economy-trumps-terrorism-dems-will-win-in-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/if-the-economy-trumps-terrorism-dems-will-win-in-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Rosenstock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudolph Giuliani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/if-the-economy-trumps-terrorism-dems-will-win-in-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
Americans have turned markedly gloomier about the economy in recent months, a shift that is reshaping a presidential campaign long dominated by the war in Iraq and national security concerns.</p>
<p>Higher prices for gasoline and home heating oil, stock market volatility and rising mortgage foreclosures all account for some of the pessimism.</p>
<p>
If this trend continues, prepare [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><br />
<blockquote>Americans have turned markedly gloomier about the economy in recent months, a shift that is <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071212/ap_po/economy_again">reshaping a presidential campaign</a> long dominated by the war in Iraq and national security concerns.</p>
<p>Higher prices for gasoline and home heating oil, stock market volatility and rising mortgage foreclosures all account for some of the pessimism.</p></blockquote>
<p></em><br />
If this trend continues, prepare for Republicans to return the focus to fear mongering, &#8220;supporting the troops&#8221; and 9/11 &#8211; right up Rudy&#8217;s alley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonhotlist.com/if-the-economy-trumps-terrorism-dems-will-win-in-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

