But I wouldn’t take anything any Lieberman or McCain say at face value.

My concern is that many Americans are not focused on the looming threat and real enemy; Islamic Fascists. They don’t realize how pervasive and deceitful the radical Muslim threat in this country is.

The media message isn’t tainted by the military withholding or propagating disinformation in my opinion. It’s plain and simple, the partisan owners of the media/information complex want us to believe we are losing, and no matter what the cost, the want to discredit Bush. Although, he is capable of doing that on his own. In my humble opinon we don’t need to help him achieve failure. He’s quite capable of it.

I’m not a Bush apologist and I’d don’t see the benefit of bashing our own President when it aids, abeits, and encourages the enemy to fight on. I highly recommend you listen to the briefing given by Liberman and McCain on C-SPAN.

Regards,

DM

Sen. McCain (R-AZ) and Sen. Lieberman (I-CT) on Iraq Troop Surge (01/05/2007)

rtsp://video.c-span.org/project/iraq/iraq010507_sens.rm

Don’t be surprised if your food tastes funny next time you dine out.

By your own ‘logic’, Bush’s views shouldn’t mean squat because of his family’s longtime ties to wealthy Muslims in Saudi Arabia. Its ruling family has a long-standing, more than cordial, relationship with the Bushes.

Saudi Arabia’s rulers are despots who rule in a medieval monarchy that isn’t a democracy or a democratic republic, doesn’t respect the rights of women, and still holds public executions by decapitation.

Where is Bush’s tender concern for freedom when he deals with his family’s old friends, these medieval monarchs?

It’s laughable that you should mention the “poorly informed American public”. One of the reasons the public here might be less informed than they could be is because the Pentagon controls the flow of information out of Iraq.

The ‘embedded reporters’ sham was a PR stroke of genius.

rtsp://video.c-span.org/project/iraq/iraq010507_sens.rm

Check it out…

http://deadmessenger.wordpress.com/2006/10/28/msg-oct-3-2006-re-wimpy-rambossaloncom/

Who elected the head of the texas law firm Baker & Botts to serve as our secretary of state? Baker? His firm has very well known ties to and representation of wealthy Muslims in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere. His views don’t mean squat! He’s Neville Chamberline reincarnate; an appeaser with a conflict of interest.

It sounds to me like the commentor hates George Bush more than he wants to win the war in Iraq; a beach head in the war on Islamic Fascisim. General Abazide also testified in the same committe last month that he believe the Iraqis want to win the war and can win the war with our help without any reservation.

Agreeable, Georgy does have problems, but he isn’t the only one that makes up the office of the president. And he isn’t the only one that believes we can win this conflict. Taking pot shots a Georgy is easy shoot’n. Why don’t we spend more time aiming at the enemy instead of lobbing friendly fire at our own countrymen.

Iraq isn’t the apex of the war against Islamic Fascism and their employment of Fabian Strategy and terrorism. I think George sees the bigger picture and the problem is the poorly informed American Public doesn’t. They only see what the bought and paid for media wants them to believe; defeat.

George W. Bush exploited the mass appeal of end times religion in the U.S. to rally public support for his ‘war on terror’, as part of a larger politics of fear and paranoia.

The White House cynically joined forces with the millenarians in their drive for more domestic power, in a bid to rattle nuclear sabres at the “axis of evil”.

I believe this sort of latter-day dispensationalism wielded by the most heavily-armed nation on earth is more to be feared than Iran or North Korea.

Any movement by the Bush administration to utilise the military for purposes not mandated by the Constitution is to be regarded with deep suspicion.

Amen.